>>25513223
>it transfers data omnidirectionally, which means its slower than the directly transferred wired connections
You literally don't know how wireless transmission works. That isn't a metaphorical insult, that is a literal and explicit declaration of you being ignorant of a modern form of technology.
>And sending all that data wirelessly would literally microwave your brain.
So, OAM transmissions don't exist already?
This sounds like the sort of mythological shit that old people spout, like TVs burn out your eyes or cell phones give you cancer.
